MALPRACTICES IN REGULATORY SUBMISSION
Authors: Kavya K , KRUTHIKA B T, JOSHI V AND ABHISHEK B V

ABSTRACT
Malpractice in regulatory submissions can compromise product efficacy, safety, and integrity, negatively impacting health and legal situations. Common types of submissions include clinical trials, changes to information, marketing applications, and post-approval commitments. The FDA has tightened submission conditions, with 32% of trial data showing serious problems with data compliance. To optimize submissions, companies should maintain extensive regulatory knowledge, stay updated on regulations, guidelines, and standards, and participate in meetings and discussions before filing. Collaboration between senior management and submission teams is crucial, as unrealistic deadlines can increase risk. Ensuring regulatory submissions is a complex process that requires extensive knowledge, effective communication, and a commitment to avoiding malpractice. Malpractice, characterized by actions that defy standards, bias, and public opinion, is influenced by weak legislative frameworks, disproportionate company influence, and lack of initiative. Implementing a structured SOP and staying updated on regulations can help companies navigate the complex process of regulatory submissions, improving their chances of success. Keywords: Malpractices, Regulatory Submissions, Optimization, SOP’s
Publication date: 01/08/2025
    https://ijbpas.com/pdf/2025/August/MS_IJBPAS_2025_9374.pdf
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2025/14.8.9374