CORRELATION OF ADMISSION CARDIOTOCOGRAPHY SCORE AND FETAL CORD BLOOD PH IN PREDICTING PERINATAL OUTCOME Authors: Patil DS* And Laddad M
ABSTRACT
Fetal heart rate monitoring was first started for knowing hypoxia and pH changes in the fetus, which
can cause multiple fetal complications. The dreaded consequences of hypoxia and acidemia can lead
to intrapartum or neonatal death. The less severe hypoxia may cause transient or long term effects in
the fetus. CTG is very valuable in high-risk cases in which the abnormal fetal heart rate patterns had
utmost impact on fetal outcome, in the mode of delivery and admission to neonatal intensive care unit.
Normal umbilical cord pH is 7.2 to 7.4. Milder degrees of hypoxia/acidosis correspond to pH values
between 7.0 and 7.20, while a pH below 7.0 denotes severe asphyxia and is associated with
neurological dysfunction and neonatal death. The present study was conducted in a tertiary hospital in
the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. The study included 340pregnant women above 37
weeks gestation with singleton pregnancy and cephalic presentation admitted in labour.CTG score
was obtained and cord blood samples were collected after delivery for pH estimation. APGAR score
was given to neonates at 1 minute and 5 minutes after delivery and history of NICU admission noted.
This study showed that abnormal and suspicious CTG scores were significantly associated with NICU
admission of neonates, lower APGAR scores and acidic blood pH of the neonates. More than 92% of
the cases with suspicious and abnormal CTG scores required NICU admission. Not only APGAR
score at 1 minute but also APGAR score at 5 minutes are significantly associated with CTG
score.CTG score estimation is a helpful tool for earlier detection of unfavourable neonatal outcomes
prompting earlier intervention.
Keywords: Cord blood pH;CTG score; Electronic fetal monitoring; Labour admission test; Neonatal
outcome Publication date: 15/02/2022 https://ijbpas.com/pdf/2022/February/MS_IJBPAS_2022_FEB_SPCL_1037.pdfDownload PDFhttps://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2022/11.2.1037