A STUDY IN MICROBIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF NECROTISING FASCIITIS IN NON-DIABETIC PATIENTS Authors: Hubert Cyril Lourdes* and Gawtham D
ABSTRACT
Background: Human beings are generally well build, well-nourished and well cared, in
general terms they are otherwise healthy. Metabolic diseases are more common during
maturity of age. Diabetes is one of the most common metabolic disease prevailing and is
recently in the raising side of the curve. Though Diabetes is a metabolic disease, it’s a state of
immune compromise. Generally Necrotising Fasciitis is most common in diabetic patients. It
is also called as flesh eating disease. For a non-diabetic otherwise healthy individual, getting
Necrotising Fasciitis is quite rare. Materials and Methods: The key aim of this study is to
identify the most common and prevalent causes for organisms responsible for
NecrotisingFasciitis in Non-Diabetic patients. In this study, 50 patients presenting with
painful swelling in the leg with / without blisters or ulcers to the Department of General
Surgery, SBMCH were selected, segregated, Prepared and treated, following which serial
wound swabs were taken from the wound site and studied. Results: The most common
organism grown is gram negative rods and gram positive cocci. Streptococcus pyogenes
followed by proteus mirabilis were the most common organism. Methicillin sensitive
Staphylococcus aureus were also grown in common. Piperacillin tazobactam and 3rd
generation cephalosporins were the sensitive antibiotics and are also the choice of empirical
antibiotics. Conclusion: It has been concluded that poor wound care, local application of native medicine and low socioeconomic state can be the cause of Necrotising Fasciitis but
under strict asepsis during perioperative period along with rational use of antibiotics to
prevent the development of resistance and proper wound care, this can be treated
Keywords: Necrotising Fasciitis, antibiotics sensitivity, wound care Publication date: 01/11/2021 https://ijbpas.com/pdf/2021/November/MS_IJBPAS_2021_57444.pdfDownload PDFhttps://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2021/10.11.57444