COMPARATIVE E FFECT OF BUPIVACAINE VE RSUS LIGNOCAINE ANAE STHETI C AGENT S USE D FOR SURGIC AL REMOVAL OF MANDIBUL AR IMPACTED THIR D MOL ARS. – A SYSTEMATIC RE VIEW
Authors: Murali S* and Madhulaxmi M

ABSTRACT
B ACKGRO UND Impa c t ed t hi r d mol ar s a re c ommonl y e nc o unt er ed cl i ni ca l fi nd ing i n t he gen er al popula t i on. S ur gi cal r emo val of imp ac te d ma ndi bul a r t hi rd mol a rs i s a ma ndat o r y t o pr eve nt an y c omp li c a ti on s such a s oc cu rre nc e o f a n y pa thol o gi es l i ke c yst o r a n y sou ght o f be ni gn t umours pe rt a ini ng t o t he i mpa ct ed mol a r, a nd TMJ pa i n pert a i ni ng t o t he impac t e d t oot h. T hus in re cent yea rs remo val o f impa ct e d ma ndi bul ar t e et h ha s become almost manda t or y due t o i t s va r ia t i ons i n mor phol o gy whi ch re sult s i n impact i on a nd al so due t o i t s l ess and l e ss usage ca use of wh ic h i t s a lmost be co mi ng vesti gi a l . In past dec a des t he re ha s bee n va ri ou s t ec hni que s i n remova l o f impa ct ed t oot h usi ng var i ous a naest het i c a ge nt s, among whi c h com monl y u sed wa s li gn oca i ne.....
Publication date: 1/1/21
    https://ijbpas.com/pdf/2021/January/MS_IJBPAS_2021_5327.pdf
Download PDF
https://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2021/10.1.5327