EXCISION OF MULTIPLE AND RECURRENT FIBROADENOMA; ANALYSIS OF SURGICAL OUTCOMEWITH PERIAREOLAR INCISION Authors: Malik MR , KEERIO RB, ABBAS K, MUNEEB M AND ASHRAF Z
ABSTRACT
Background
Fibro-adenoma of breast, the most common benign breast condition among women under 35
years of age, accounts for up to 94% of all biopsied breast lumps. Despite no necessary need, the
fibro-ademoais often excised due to incumbent anxietyand asymmetry (if enlarged). The excision
methods are many with an even greater variety of incisions practiced in each technique, yet no
consensus exists regarding the best incision for the excision of multiple and recurrent fibroadenomas.
Objective
To determine the surgical outcome following peri-areolar incision for the
excision of multiple and recurrent fibro-adenomas.
Methodology
This cross-sectional analysis was carried out from November 2018 to January 2019 upon a
sample of 87 female patients (aged 15 to 35), presenting to the Dept. of Surgery at Dow
University Hospital, Karachi with multiple and recurrent fibro-adenomas (chosen via nonprobability,
purposive sampling). Data obtained regarding surgical outcome (in terms of areolar
necrosis, loss of nipple sensation, hematoma, surgical site infection and patient satisfaction) was
recorded onto a self-structured proforma after taking written informed consent. The data
obtained was analyzed using SPSS v. 22.0.
Results
Surgical site infection, hematoma, Loss of nipple sensation and areolar necrosis were reported on
first follow-up among 12.64%, 9.2%, 8% and 5.75%of the patients respectively. The aesthetic
outcome was perceived good in majority (65.52%) of the patients on last final follow-up.
Conclusion
After careful consideration, it can be concluded that peri-areolar incision for the
excision of multiple and recurrent fibro-adenomas offer great promise of favorable outcome.
Keywords: Fibro-Adenoma, Breast Lump, Breast Surgery, Peri-Areolar Incision
and Surgical Outcome Publication date: 01/05/2020 https://ijbpas.com/pdf/2020/May/MS_IJBPAS_2020_5057.pdfDownload PDFhttps://doi.org/10.31032/IJBPAS/2020/9.5.5057